Film Review: Oldboy (2003)
Oldboy, Park Chan-wook’s 2003 South Korean film, is routinely placed amongst the greatest films ever made. While such hallowed status can occasionally feel slightly overpraised in the relentless echo chamber of cinephile discourse, its position as one of the most iconic and influential works of 21st-century cinema is unquestionable. It was a pivotal force in imprinting South Korea firmly onto the global cinematic map, a catalyst for the international ‘Korean Wave’ that would later culminate in triumphs like Parasite. Its imagery, from a hammer-wielding vengeance-seeker to a live octopus consumption, has been seared into popular culture, referenced and homaged endlessly. The film is the second, and most celebrated, chapter of Park’s thematically linked ‘Vengeance Trilogy’, situated between the raw bleakness of Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance (2002) and the stylised moral reckoning of Lady Vengeance (2005).
The narrative, adapted from Garon Tsuchiya and Nobuaki Minegishi’s 1996-1998 Japanese manga, is a masterclass in controlled, escalating mystery. In 1988 Seoul, businessman Oh Dae-su (Choi Min-sik) is arrested for public drunkenness, causing him to miss his daughter’s fourth birthday. Upon release, he is kidnapped and wakes in a private prison cell, where he will remain for fifteen years. His only window to the world is a television, through which he learns his wife has been murdered and he is the prime suspect. This injustice fuels a gruelling physical and mental transformation; he becomes a machine of vengeance, training relentlessly for the day he might escape and unmask his captor. That day arrives abruptly, with his unexplained release into a disorienting, unfamiliar world. He finds solace and then romance with Mi-do (Kang Hye-jeong), a sympathetic sushi chef, and enlists an old friend, No Joo-hwan (Ji Dae-han), to find his missing daughter. His anonymous tormentor, who identifies himself as “Evergreen” (Yoo Ji-tae), then presents a grotesque ultimatum: Oh Dae-su has five days to discover his true identity and the reason for his imprisonment, or Mi-do will die.
Where Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance was a commercial and critical struggle, Oldboy was an immediate and immense success both domestically and internationally. Its acclaim was cemented at the 2004 Cannes Film Festival, where it won the Grand Prix, famously championed by jury president Quentin Tarantino. Tarantino’s very public admiration, however, became a double-edged sword, leading some more snobbish Western critics to dismiss the film as merely “Tarantinoesque”—accusing it of being exploitative and gratuitous in its depiction of violence. This criticism often fixated on three particularly shocking sequences: the now-legendary consumption of a live octopus, the brutal dental extraction, and the tongue-severing performed with a pair of scissors. Yet, to reduce Oldboy to its violence is to profoundly miss the point.
Park Chan-wook directs this operatically dark tale with a Kubrickian fastidiousness. Every frame is meticulously composed, with a vibrant colour palette that externalises the characters' turbulent emotions. The visual contrast is stark and symbolic: Oh Dae-su’s claustrophobic, monochrome prison cell is the antithesis of Lee Woo-jin’s (“Evergreen’s”) minimalist, opulent penthouse, a modern-day Mount Olympus from which a vengeful god surveys his mortal plaything. This god-like imagery is intentional; Park stated he cast the youthful, angelic-featured Yoo Ji-tae specifically to create the contrast of a “Greek god” against Choi Min-sik’s ravaged everyman. The film’s most iconic moment remains the breathtaking corridor fight, a three-minute single-take sequence where Oh Dae-su, armed only with a hammer, battles a small army of henchmen. It is a brutally realistic depiction of exhausting, messy combat, devoid of stylised wirework, and has become one of the most referenced action scenes in modern cinema.
Park’s progress as a storyteller from Sympathy for Mr. Vengeance is markedly evident. The plot of Oldboy unfolds with a relentless, propulsive energy, its near-two-hour runtime passing swiftly. Exposition is deftly handled through flashbacks that perfectly contextualise the deepening mystery, leading to a climax of almost Shakespearean tragedy. The film’s deliberately ambiguous ending, a masterstroke of painful revelation, completes its horrific logic. The casting is uniformly superb. Choi Min-sik delivers a titanic performance, physically transforming from a paunchy, bewildered everyman into a feral angel of vengeance, and finally into a broken, pathetic wreck—a journey he prepared for with immense dedication, including gaining weight and learning martial arts. Kang Hye-jeong is equally effective, her character seen through Oh Dae-su’s idealising lens: ethereally beautiful upon first meeting, yet later revealed as a warmly ordinary young woman, making their connection all the more tragically real.
As a macabre revenge thriller, Oldboy succeeds brilliantly, with its antagonist always chillingly several steps ahead of the protagonist. However, the film is not without minor flaws. At times, Park’s undeniable style can threaten to overwhelm substance. Certain moments, particularly in the heightened emotional crescendo of the finale, risk tipping into melodrama, with the acting verging on the hammy.
Yet, when all is said and done, these are quibbles against a monumental achievement. Oldboy is a very good film that has earned the majority of its lofty status. Its influence and classic standing have been validated by numerous critics’ polls. Its cultural footprint is further evidenced by the existence of two remakes: an unofficial 2006 Bollywood adaptation, Zinda, and an official, though predictably inferior, 2013 Hollywood version directed by Spike Lee. The latter, while a capable reinterpretation, failed to capture the visceral, shocking essence of the original and was met with largely negative reviews. Park Chan-wook’s film, by contrast, remains a brutal, beautiful, and philosophically ruthless exploration of obsession, guilt, and the cyclical nature of vengeance. It is a landmark work that, two decades on, has lost none of its intensity or its capacity to provoke and enthrall. It solidified Park Chan-wook as a world-class auteur and stands as a definitive, unforgettable entry in the annals of modern cinema.
RATING: 8/10 (+++)
==
Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com
Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/
InLeo blog https://inleo.io/@drax.leo
InLeo: https://inleo.io/signup?referral=drax.leo
Leodex: https://leodex.io/?ref=drax
Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax
Rising Star game: https://www.risingstargame.com?referrer=drax
1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e
BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG
ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7
BCH donations: qpvxw0jax79lhmvlgcldkzpqanf03r9cjv8y6gtmk9