Television Review: The Measure of a Man (Star Trek: The Next Generation, S2X09, 1989)

The Measure of a Man (S02E09)

Airdate: February 13th 1989

Written by: Melinda Snodgrass
Directed by: Robert Scheerer

Running Time: 46 minutes

It is widely acknowledged that Star Trek: The Next Generation, despite its subsequent canonisation as a cornerstone of the franchise’s so-called Golden Age, endured an exceptionally turbulent and uncertain first season. Behind the polished veneer of the 24th century, the production was mired in dysfunction, creative chaos, and a litany of missteps that left cast and crew deeply sceptical about the series’ viability. Years later, numerous participants, including key figures like Jonathan Frakes and Marina Sirtis, openly admitted they harboured genuine doubts about whether the show possessed any sustainable future. This pervasive atmosphere of uncertainty began to dissipate only as the series gradually refined its identity and storytelling prowess. Many within the production circle pinpoint the Season 2 episode The Measure of a Man as the pivotal moment that finally eradicated their lingering scepticism, convincing them they were contributing to something truly grand. Unsurprisingly, this episode remains consistently lauded as not merely one of the finest instalments of The Next Generation, but as a high watermark for the entire Star Trek franchise, revered for its intellectual rigour and profound thematic exploration.

The episode commences with a cold open establishing a now-iconic TNG tradition: a poker game aboard the Enterprise. Data, possessing computational intellect far exceeding any human, participates alongside Riker, Geordie, Pulaski and O'Brien. His defeat stems from a fundamental gap in understanding human nature; he cannot grasp the concept of bluffing, a purely psychological gambit reliant on deception and emotional manipulation. Riker exploits this, demonstrating that Data’s inability to fathom the illogical, the emotional, and the intentionally deceptive renders him vulnerable in a contest governed by human frailty. This seemingly minor scene is far from mere character colour; it sets the precise thematic stage for the episode’s central conflict. Data’s vulnerability in the poker game foreshadows his existential vulnerability in the main plot, where he faces a far more consequential contest.

The narrative swiftly pivots to the arrival of Admiral Nakamura (Clyde Kusatsu) and Commander Bruce Maddox (Brian Brophy) at Starbase 173. Maddox, Starfleet’s cybernetics expert, outlines his intention: to deactivate and physically disassemble Data in order to study his positronic brain, with the explicit goal of reverse-engineering and mass-producing androids. Picard and the crew react with visceral horror, but their dismay deepens upon learning Data has already been transferred to Maddox’s lab under orders to comply. Data’s polite but firm refusal triggers Maddox’s core argument: Data, as property, not a person, possesses no right to refuse. Data’s subsequent resignation from Starfleet is met with Maddox’s retort that resignation is impossible for "it," reinforcing the dehumanising stance that Data is mere Starfleet equipment. This stark confrontation crystallises the episode’s central question: what constitutes personhood, and who gets to decide?

The resolution is thrust into a formal hearing presided over by Captain Phillipa Louvois (Amanda McBroom), the base’s Judge Advocate General. With qualified Starfleet JAG officers absent, Louvois makes the ruling that Picard must defend Data’s personhood while Riker, Maddox’s subordinate, must argue against it. Riker is initially appalled at the prospect of prosecuting his friend, yet his sense of duty compels him to prepare rigorously. His courtroom performance is masterful; he constructs a compelling case that Data, despite his sophistication, is ultimately a complex machine – a product of design and manufacture, lacking true consciousness, emotions, or the capacity for growth beyond his programming. Picard, however, delivers a transcendent counter-argument. He shifts the focus from Data’s origins to his capabilities and potential: his drive to grow, learn, experience, and define himself. Picard’s argument transcends legal technicalities, appealing to fundamental principles of liberty and the inherent value of consciousness itself. Louvois, visibly moved and intellectually convinced, rules decisively in Data’s favour, affirming his right to self-determination and allowing him to remain aboard the Enterprise. The episode concludes with Data, embodying the very humanity he was fighting to be recognised as possessing, expressing no bitterness towards Riker or even Maddox, instead offering his assistance with future research – a moment of profound grace that resonated deeply with viewers.

The Measure of a Man epitomises Star Trek at its most intellectually ambitious and morally resonant. It transcends the genre’s potential pitfalls of space opera spectacle, simplistic action, or heavy-handed allegory, instead diving fearlessly into the murky philosophical depths of consciousness, autonomy, and the definition of life itself. While the outcome feels inevitable to modern audiences steeped in Data’s established character, the episode’s greatness lies in the meticulous, respectful, and genuinely suspenseful presentation of the debate. Both sides are granted compelling, logically coherent arguments, avoiding caricature. Stewart’s commanding moral authority, Frakes’ nuanced portrayal of professional duty clashing with personal loyalty, and Spiner’s subtle conveyance of Data’s quiet yearning for recognition combine to create an unparalleled dramatic intensity within the courtroom setting.

The script, written by Melinda M. Snodgrass – a former attorney making her screenwriting debut – is a masterclass in structure and thematic cohesion. Originally crafted during the 1988 Writers Guild of America strike, Snodgrass infused the narrative with her professional experiences, ensuring procedural authenticity. Her battle with Gene Roddenberry over the inclusion of lawyers is particularly revealing; Roddenberry, clinging to his vision of a conflictless 24th century, initially deemed the legal profession obsolete, conveniently overlooking its presence in the original series’ episode Court Martial. Snodgrass prevailed, recognising that law, even in a utopia, is the essential framework for resolving disputes and defining rights. Her script integrates every element flawlessly: the poker cold open isn’t just character development but a thematic blueprint; the courtroom drama leverages established continuity, notably referencing Data’s relationship with Tasha Yar from the maligned Season 1 episode The Naked Now as evidence of his capacity for emotional connection and growth; and it subtly builds on earlier character dynamics, such as Data’s previous dehumanisation in The Schizoid Man or Riker’s professional rigour in A Matter of Honour. Director Robert Scheerer expertly modulates the tone, balancing the heavy philosophical weight with moments of human warmth, including Picard’s crucial, morally charged conversation with Guinan about slavery’s legacy and the subtle history between Picard and Louvois, adding layers of emotional complexity without overwhelming the central argument.

If a flaw exists, it resides primarily in Brian Brophy’s performance as Maddox. While effectively portraying scientific arrogance and ambition, his delivery occasionally veers into the realm of the melodramatic, bordering on hammy. Maddox’s fervour sometimes feels less like the passion of a dedicated researcher and more like the cartoonish zeal of a villain, a slight misstep in an otherwise impeccably balanced narrative where the true antagonist is institutionalised prejudice and narrow definitions of life, not necessarily the individual advocating them.

Nevertheless, The Measure of a Man stands as a monumental achievement. It is the episode where The Next Generation definitively shed the shadow of its own shaky beginnings and, perhaps more significantly, the long shadow cast by The Original Series. It moved beyond replicating Kirk’s swashbuckling heroics to embrace Picard’s role as a thoughtful diplomat, philosopher, and guardian of principle. By tackling questions of personhood, rights, and the ethical implications of creating life with such unflinching intelligence and emotional depth, it demonstrated the unique potential of Star Trek to engage with profound ideas within a science fiction framework. It proved the series was not merely a competent successor, but a vital evolution of the franchise’s core mission: to explore the final frontier of human (and non-human) understanding.

RATING: 9/10 (++++)

Blog in Croatian https://draxblog.com
Blog in English https://draxreview.wordpress.com/
InLeo blog https://inleo.io/@drax.leo

LeoDex: https://leodex.io/?ref=drax
InLeo: https://inleo.io/signup?referral=drax.leo
Hiveonboard: https://hiveonboard.com?ref=drax
Rising Star game: https://www.risingstargame.com?referrer=drax
1Inch: https://1inch.exchange/#/r/0x83823d8CCB74F828148258BB4457642124b1328e

BTC donations: 1EWxiMiP6iiG9rger3NuUSd6HByaxQWafG
ETH donations: 0xB305F144323b99e6f8b1d66f5D7DE78B498C32A7
BCH donations: qpvxw0jax79lhmvlgcldkzpqanf03r9cjv8y6gtmk9