The Man in the High Castle (season 2): The journey so far is very very slow

(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I made a mistake and actually looked at the overall review percentages for this decent series season by season and found that season 2 is ranked considerably lower than the others. Since I enjoyed the ending of season 1 (not gonna spoil it) I figured I would carry on watching but only at night in my bed because this series moves very slowly and has so many characters introduced that it is difficult to follow.

When a new season of anything starts we kind of expect the first episode to be absolutely outstanding because in showbusiness it is commonly known that you have to start strong and finish strong. The accomplished this is season 1 although I did have many many gripes about how slowly the show moved and how too much time was spent on useless dialogue in order to make episodes near an hour long with a prescribed 10 episode season.


image.png
src

This is going to sound very vague because I don't want to spoil things for any potential viewers so I am going to stick to basics that you would see in the trailer and also learn in the first 20 minutes of the first episode of season 1. Basically, the Nazis and Japanese have won WW2 and have taken over the United States. Things are peaceful now but all semblance of the United States even being a nation is non-existent. The "Americans" that lived there after the country was conquered are allowed to continue living there but live under authoritarian rule that honestly, doesn't seem all that bad. They do make the scenery intentionally very grey to make life seem mundane, but for the most part people carry one with their lives only much of their surroundings are now in German or Japanese.


image.png
src

The entire resistance movement that is taking place in the series revolves around these bits of film that appear here and there that contain footage of an alternate reality compared to what is actually going on in the film. The films bits show the Allies winning WW2 and these bits of film are highly sought after by both the resistance and the Nazis. The Japanese up to this point seem to be either unaware of their existence or have very little interest in acquiring them.

We mostly focus on a few core characters of Juliana, Frank (urgh, that guy annoys me), and Joe. Who are all heavily involved in the obtaining of the films although 2 of them initially wanted nothing to do with it and were content to simply carry on living their lives in Japanese occupied California. The main baddie, who is kind of presented as a good guy that I think will later become a bigger part of the overall pictures is an American who reports to Hitler named John Smith who holds one of the highest ranks in the Nazi party that is obtainable. Out of the 4 characters that I have touched base on thus far, John Smith is, in my opinion, the only one that is really all that interesting.


image.png
src

John's story unraveling is the only one that really holds my interest because despite his devotion to the Reich, he seems to have a secret crisis of conscious about his position and even though I have not looked ahead to see what happens, I would be willing to bet that he turns later into a "good guy." I could be wrong about this but I have a pretty good track record of being able to see the future as far as characters are concerned.

I am only on episode 3 of Season 2 at the moment but honestly, I think it will take some high levels of boredom in my regular life to actually finish all of it because it is moving so damn slowly that it is maddening. This is what happens when a US production company gets a hold of a 200 page book and decides to make a 40-hour series out of it. In my mind, there simply isn't enough source material in the Philip K. Dick novel to justify a series of this epic length. This doesn't seem to matter a great deal to the people who make series in the States though and just like with most shows they seem to be dragging it out for as long as they possibly can. Thus far, everything I have seen take place in the story could have easily been fit into 3 or MAYBE 4 total episodes and even that would be stretching it out.

Instead of having things move along we have a never-ending circle of bickering between the main characters especially between Juliana and Frank - who is one of the most annoying characters in any series I have watched in recent years.


image.png
src

It probably isn't entirely actor Rupert Evans' fault that his character is so cringe but rather than coming across as a seriously important cog in the machine he just seems like a whiney bitch boy who continually slows things down and screws things up with his erratic behavior. I mentioned before in my first write up about season 1 that his basement apartment where he is doing illegal or semi-illegal things in is constantly unlocked and this annoyance continues into season 2. Almost any time that Frank is in the apartment, which is a terrible place to hide anyway, the door is always unlocked and someone is going to come by, walk on in, and there is going to be 8 minutes of senseless dialogue that doesn't advance the story one iota.

All the nasty things I have been saying thus far still don't take away from the fact that Amazon has done a very good job of "drip-feeding" crucial information to the audience. We really DO want to know who the "Man in the High Castle" actually is, and they are not doling out this information very quickly. It's a dirty tactic that is likely going to result in me simply reading a blurb about season 2 rather than watching all of it.

I can no longer give this series a recommended rating and am downgrading it. Honestly, if I had a better series on deck I likely wouldn't be watching it anymore.


50119633_m.jpg
at the moment this series is only available on Amazon Prime or you could always go sailing to get it



0
0
0.000
(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});
9 comments
avatar

"It sounds like you have some mixed feelings about the show's second season, and I appreciate your honest assessment. Slow pacing and characters' actions can indeed be frustrating, and it's disappointing when a series drags its storyline unnecessarily. I understand your points about the show's pacing and character development.

Shows based on books sometimes do face the challenge of stretching the source material to create multiple seasons. Not every adaptation is successful in retaining the audience's interest, and it's a matter of personal preference.

Your insights into the characters and the development of the plot are valid, and it's clear you have a critical eye for storytelling. Sometimes, it's a good idea to balance between watching and reading to get the information you're looking for, especially if you're more interested in the story's resolution.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts and offering a candid review of the series!" 📺🎬

avatar

Thanks buddy. As far as this show is concerned, I was not familiar with the source material. Until you mentioned it I wasn't aware it was based on a book but it makes sense that it is.

Slow pacing is something that a lot of series suffer from and much of the time, this is something that happens with American-made series. They feel compelled to have a certain number of episodes per season regardless of whether or not they actually have enough story for a season of that length.

While I don't do it very often, I sometimes prefer UK-based series that the season is however many episodes it takes to tell the story. Sherlock Holmes was a good example of this. Sometimes it was 5 episodes, sometimes it was 3, once it was only 2. They also didn't allow themselves to be pressured into releasing a season every single year. They seem to have waited until they had the right story in place, and then it might be several years before the next installment was out to the users. This might be a bit annoying to people that are impatient, but in the end it makes for much better viewing.

avatar

Sometimes, these TV adaptations need to find a way of balancing between expanding on the source material and keeping the story engaging. It is important to keep the viewers sticking around. I guess that why some good potential series get cancelled or ratings goes down. Maybe if they have reduce the running time of each episode, it would have met your expectations. pacing and character development in this season. This series was recommended to me recently, I have not just had the time to watch it. I guess I won't be watch again. Thank you for this honest review, it was nice to read from you again.

avatar

well don't simply not watch it because of me. I have very specific things that I require from a series in order to enjoy it and one of the things that I absolutely hate is when it is obvious they are dragging out a situation in order to fill up the required 1-hour for 12 episodes format. Some people don't mind that. I say give it a try in the first season and see if it floats your boat.

avatar

How many times does this happen when we see the second season not live up to the first season. maybe all the ideas was used in season 1 and now they have to come up with new concepts. It is like they were not prepared and relying on the fans from season 1 pulling them through.

avatar

a great example of what you just said would be the wildly popular series LOST. The first season of that was excellent, and it went badly downhill as it became clear they didn't really have an overall story in mind at all. The reason for this was because they had only written a story for the first few episodes when they started making it... they had no idea it would be a hit.

Once that happened, the writers were under pressure to get a script out the door at a rapid pace and had to extend the story further and further because people were still tuning in. The story was so convoluted and silly by the end of it that I don't think anyone actually understands what even happened in the final season. The only reason why the final season was the "final" season is because about 1/4 the amount of people were tuning in anymore.

avatar

That makes sense as the writers put all the effort into the first season selling the idea to their backers and actually shot themselves in the foot with no where else to turn. You cannot continue on the same level forever and every series should rather be shorter than longer as you cannot keep churning out script worthy material.

avatar

The first season is good and the second one is not as you say so I will try to watch both seasons and then let you know how I feel. You have not recommended. If you are saying that there is time then watch then I will also try to watch it and then see how the acting is done.